Big Brother 12 Week 5 Recap: Hypocrites United!!

Week 5: It's Brenchel versus "The House"!!!!

While I haven’t had the time to catch up on RHONJ like I wish I could, I have been on top of Big Brother and the feeds. I’m going to state it loud & clear: I LIKE Rachel & Brendon. Do I believe they are innocent victims and deserve none of the attacks/insults/fights? Absolutely not, they can be annoying and insulting as shit; however, I find “the house” even MORE disgusting by comparison. Ragan & Brit have to be the most vile, hypocritical, insulting HGs since Nat, Chelsea, and James. The entire “house” does nothing but trade personal insults/attacks about Brenchel 24/7. Nothing Brenchel does is every okay with “the house.” If Brenchel segregate themselves, they are mocked for a showmance. When Brenchel comes out and tries to be civil, “the house” complains how they hate sharing the same air and how the pair “make this house unlivable.” Individually, HAYDEN, Kathy, Brit, and Ragan play nice IF Brenchel is in power and as soon as the pair are not in power, it turns into the I Hate Brenchel show 24/7.

Rach was even crying the other night “how can Britney be so pretty on the outside & ugly on the inside” because it’s true: Brit is funny & times and cute but she is a royal CUNT. Yup, my lovely CUNextTuesday has been officially switched from Ashley Holmes to Britney AND Ragan, for that matter (for the summer, at least. I reserve the right to switch it right back to Ashley’s ass as I deem fit). More often than not, Brenchel talks about a person after being attacked or backstabbed, i.e. Brit, Ragan, Kristen and Matt and usually brings it to his/her face. They do not just sit around and talk about everyone else like the rest of the house does all.day.long. I do see a difference between talking smack when provoked vs unprovoked. The house personally attacks Brenchel 24/7 and has been for weeks. It’s never smack about gameplay, it’s always personal and honestly Ragan has crossed the line between lovable gay to self-hating queen, saying some vile stuff about “taking it up the ass/old whore who trades sexy for $1000 bottles/his entire family hates him and so do we” & so on about both of them (don’t even GET me started on their nightly “tv” show entitled “Just the Tip” in reference to Brendon’s toe in which they personally attack, ridicule, and insult Brendon & Rachel). And who is there cackling right next to Ragan? Britney. Brit is a bitch who can say whatever she wants & when Brenchel retorts during an argument, she cries foul. I call BS on them all & voted for Ragan for Sabo so he can Sabo his butt right into the jury house. Do these folks not see the end game and how they may need Brenchel’s vote once the Wackade™ ( much better than Brigade, no)  implode on itself? Even yesterday Ragan & Matt were talking about the boot order & Ragan thru Brit under the bus, so lawd knows Ragan is ready to boot Kathy & Brit out so he can be 5th in a 4 person alliance he doesn’t even fully realize. Just like CBS edited Chima, they are editing the house towards Brenchel’s showmance and “the rest of the house” are innocent bystanders when that’s hardly the case AT ALL.

And let me talk about Kathy for a minute. Old sweet & lovable Mama Kathy, who spouts lessons of good sportsmanship & keeping it classy while piling on cheap mascara, throwing comps, telling us how her son gets drunk (under age, I might add, Ms. Sheriff), and chain-smoking in the backyard 24/7. When Rachel said “floaters get a life vest” after that HOH comp, she was  (IMO) specifically talking about Kristen (Rach was not sure she was in alliance other than her secret showmance with HAYDEN at the time), Ragan, Kristen, and Kathy – ALL 4 of which had NO alliances in the house by their own admission. Rach did not say anything to anyone directly BUT Kristen, so why Kathy take it personally? Oh yea, cuz she’s a FLOATER lol. Rach was happy she won HOH because she had to in order to save herself, point-blank. So now that Kathy does the same thing, it’s okay because it’s Kathy? I call BULLSHIT. Kathy screamed YES because she knocked Rachel out because “the house” hates her, Kathy didn’t get excited cuz she won (cuz she didn’t) she was simply screaming with glee in Rach’s face that SHE knocked her out the POV comp, hugged Brit in her excitement over doing so & she’s admitted it on the feeds. So Rach simply called her on it “why is it ok for you to shout with glee when you win, but I can’t?” Kathy is a hypocrite, running up to the HOH and embellishing to Ragan that “Rach was just POed cuz she picked me thinking she could beat me but didn’t.” How was Kathy’s behavior remotely classy OR good sportsmanship? This is why I side with Rach/Bren: altho they have their moments, they are more honest with disdain & their reasoning behind it then the rest of “the house.” Kathy only had a backbone cuz she was surrounded “by the house.” In addition, Kathy even told Ragan how Rach mentioned letting her sleep in the HOH during 1 of her weeks & Kathy cackled “cuz I USED you, you dumbass. I don’t like you I just used you” to Ragan. Kathy classy? Yea right. At least Rachel admitted “yes Kathy, I picked you cuz I thought I could beat you” to her face! I also saw Brenchel clap for Britney when she won. Bad sportsmanship DOES NOT equate to having to be fucking happy when the people who win are not on your side; in addition, doesn’t that make “the house” have bad sportsmanship since they rarely clap for Brenchel and barely congratulate either of them when they do win? AGAIN, I see a bunch of bitter hypocrites in “the house” and by that, I do mean the ENTIRE BB house.

If you look at Rach’s HOH history, she first put up Britney & Monet (BOTH floaters. And at the time both were making personal attacks/remarks 24/7 about everyone, but specifically Rachel, her implants, her hair, her job, her skin, etc out in the backyard). Next HOH, she put up Kristen & HAYDEN. All FOUR WERE TECHNICALLY FLOATERS since he house didn’t know about the Wackade™ and all four kept denying they were in ANY sort of alliance. Is Rachel yelling “floater’s get a life vest” so wrong when Rach has ACTUALLY targeting floaters? NOT AT ALL. In addition, all the floaters were the people actually UPSET she even said the statement, i.e. Kathy, Brit, Ragan, Kristen…u notice none of the Wackade™ were too upset by her statement other than HAYDEN who was taking it personal since his piece of ass Kristen (who had a MANfriend back home who HAYDEN did know about. How can u trust a chick shacking up with you after 1  week, which is DIFFERENT than Brenchel of course, when you know she got a man & she is effectively cheating on HIM WITH YOU?!?!?) was leaving. Once again, hypocritical. Of COURSE “the house” can dish personal attacks, but they sure as hell can’t take em and HEAVEN FORBID Brenchel attempt to defend themselves!

Brenchel literally had to win comps in order to survive to Week 5 and if they didn’t, they were always nominated and would have been evicted. I can see why Rach got so hysterically happy after winning a comp – it simply guaranteed their safety. It was not always as personal as “the house” makes it out to be, they simply use it as yet another excuse to personally attack/bash Brenchel, point-blank.

Matt used Brenchel: they had a deal that they wouldn’t put either up the week Matt was HOH and when Brenchel was HOH. Rach stayed true to that deal which is why she put up HAYDEN & Kristen, who at the time had no alliances other than their secret showmance. Was Kristen going up personal, yes cuz Kristen wanted to take the hypocritical route of “the showmances got to go” while secretly jerking off HAYDEN in nightvision, but at the same time the house condemned Brenchel for having a public showmance while Kristen & HAYDEN were having a secret showmance. Rach & Kristen were cool until after Andrew dropped that little nugget, so how was their noms personal? Nope, that was strategic IMO.

Kristen & HAYDEN both attempted and used Brenchel: offering that fake ass 4 person alliance. DUH Brenchel wasn’t stupid enough to fall for that BS, promptly slapped em on the block, and now HAYDEN is after Brenchel for personal reasons, NOT game reasons, point-blank. However, HAYDEN has been telling Brenchel a lot of info from “the house” which makes me think HAYDEN has finally realized in order to win he’s gonna need some jury votes. I can respect HAYDEN more than Ragan, Brit, and Kathy. Matt I’m on the fence about, mainly because of the imaginary disease he fictionally created about his snaggletoothed wife PLUS the fact he can’t keep his hands out of his pants.

Kathy used Rachel: flat out she admitted she used Rach when she was in power. When Rach is not in power, Kathy is right there with Brit & Ragan talking madd shit.

Britney used Rachel: from Day ONE. The only reason Brit is pissed at Brenchel is due to the fact that Rach pulled her SSA (super secret alliance) card and told Brit if she used the Veto on HAYDEN or Kristen, she would put up Lane. Then last night, Brendon correctly called out Brit on her hypocrisy. Everything between them FACE TO FACE has been gameplay, not personal: except Britney is 100% personal.

Ragan used Rachel: was only civil and her “friend” while in power. Now talks about her like a dog with his Fag Hag Britney. Ragan is truly more vile than Britney, Natalie from last year, AND Chelsia from the year before. The edit “the house” is getting on CBS rivals Chima’s IMO. Please note: the term “Fag hag” is gay slang and by no means a disrespectful jab at a sexual preference & lifestyle. As soon as Brit admitted” gays are my people” I KNEW she would become tight with Ragan and that after a while, they would resemble one another as far as catty, rude, and mean comments. Thus, Brit is indeed a FH; however, for the remainder of the season I will use the less insulting but widely accepted term Fruit Fly from this point out. Britney will hereby be officially referred to as Fruit Fly Brit™!)

My dream for Week 6: After ½ of Brenchel is evicted, the other wins HOH. Ragan & Brit are put up and the POV is not used. Brit& Ragan will become the new Brenchel/Kris+HAYDEN by default (friends that have to campaign against one another. PLUS with Ragan as the Sabo u know he will continue to throw Brit under the bus to last the 2nd week for him to get the 20k). THEN we can see if Matt uses the Diamond POV (DPOV)….actually, I’d just put Matt up there WITH Brit, see if Matt uses it on himself and then who he’s throw under the bus first – Enzo, Kathy, or Ragan. Matt didn’t use the DPOV this week so he only has next week before its void…if he uses it, he may lose the trust of the Wackade™ but if he doesn’t use it, will you be as pissed as me that another “power that can shake up the house”  does absolutely fucking nothing in the end? (HELLO there, Mike Boogie lol CHILLTOWN BABY!)

My prediction for tonight: I think if the hammies were smart, they would evict Brendon for 2 reasons:

1)      The thought of a post-Brendon Rachel meltdown is what they are drooling over. Personally, I just want to see the person left in the house get revenge on “the house” kwim? But I’d be lying if I didn’t say I preferred Rachel, one of the few actually PLAYING the game to win, to stay in the house. Ragan is NOT playing to win, Matt either..Britney, yea I can respect her game play, just not her as a person.

2)      There is no way I would NOT want to take Rachel to F2 since “the house” hates her and “the house” basically makes up the jury (except Brendon). I think Enzo & HAYDEN are starting to notice this, maybe even Matt. The rest of “the house” is so blinded by hate they fail to realize the power of taking either part of Brenchel to the end.

And if you have a chance, feel free to participate in this week’s poll: Which BB12 houseguest do you loathe the most? You can now vote without a cookie or IP log (YW, K2 lol) and you can vote as many times as you want. Let’s see what happens tonight, my friends. No matter what, I cannot WAIT to see what goes down on the live show and the live feeds, can you?

Advertisements
  • Trackback are closed
  • Comments (10)
    • cammie nolan
    • August 12th, 2010

    love ya tones but totally disagree. I think Brenchel (most specifically Brendon) always makes it personal. For him to comment on Brit’s relationship was way over the line. He has made gay slurs in reference to Ragan and seems obsessed that people in the house are fake and pretending to be their friends. HELLO it’s Big Brother! That’s what the game is about! No one is honest, no one tells the whole truth all the time and you have to expect that.
    Rachel wiped everyone’s face in her wins and acted completely superior to all the hg’s. She is reaping what she sowed when she was in power-and that’s cackles of glee that they have her on the block. And don’t even get me started on how Brenchel is going around saying that everyone in the house is targeting them for “love”. Puh-LEEEZE. They are an alliance! The only open alliance in the house.
    Ragan and Brit are starting to get a lot meaner, but I actually still like them….I can’t wait until Rachel is out to see what happens. If Brendon is next to go, I will be happy to watch the others to see if they do what they claim they will do-which is play the game. I’ve never seen it happen tho-eventually there will be tiffs and I CAN’T WAIT!

    • I can get why u feel that way Cames. But let me ask you this: are you telling me that you believe that Brendon and Rachel go out of their way to personally attack other HGs in the same way Brit, Ragan, Kathy do to them? I often seen Brenchel make personal remarks AFTER being attacked, after an argument, after the fact period. Not to say they never personally attack or that they do not attack first, but it always seems like they do in response to someone, not just to shoot the shit the way “the house” does. I also never said Rachel was or was not a victim of her own delusion, but I noticed that Rach often directly ask ppl “why are you targeting me” and NO ONE every just says “cuz you’re a good player/have an alliance” they always say its due to the showmance. SO WTF? Stop bullshitting and flat out tell the bitch so she can STFU, no? She is reaping what she sowed, but the fact remains HAYDEN put the target on her and Brendon WEEK 1 for simply being a showmance, it wasn’t due to her winning comps at the time because she wasn’t winning. HAYDEN & Kristen continued to fan the flame about the showmance while secretly in one of their own and the ENTIRE house jumped on the groupthink bandwagon similar to the Manzo MOB and that’s why I feel like I’m rooting for the underdogs (lmao is Brenchel this season’s Bethenny? lol) I like Brit and Ragan separately but together, I’d punch em in the throat.
      I honestly felt like Rachel threw her wins in the face of her direct competition, it was more of a relief than an intentional in your face, NOT always the entire house but I can see the other side too. Rach said from day one she was targeting floaters and she did yet everyone says Rach went personal – HOW if Kristen was indeed a floater? And Monet? And Brit at the time….she never went after someone UNLESS they told her or she got privy to them wanted her out, she then she went after them first. 1st that how BB is played? If Enzo, Hayden, Matt, and Lane are in an alliance, they AREN’T floaters so the onyl ppl pissed she made that statement are in fact the floaters themselves – the Wackade just keeps stirring the koolaid to take the heat off themselves. I think folks got 2 caught up in Rach always saying “between me and MY man” but if you really look at her nomination history, she truly went after the floaters as she stated from the day she set foot in the house.

      Week 1 Hayden nominated Brenchel, veto used by Brendon, Annie went up.
      Week 2 Rachel nominated Britney & Monet, veto used by Britney, Matt went up (who swore to Brenchel he had no alliances)
      Week 3 Matt nominated Andrew & Kathy after making a deal with Brenchel and Brendon winning the veto, thus he didn’t use it.
      Week 4 Rachel nominated Kristen and Hayden, Britney didn’t use the veto, noms stayed the same.
      Week 5 Matt nominated Brenchel, Brit won and did not use the POV.

      Now when u look at the noms, it truly does appear as if Brenchel kept any deals they made, Rachel targetting floaters or direct threats to her, and “the house” is targetting Brenchel. Brendon has won 2 POVs, Rachel as won 2 HOHs. Anyone Rach nominated directly told her that they were targeting her….so is Rach really playing personal or is “the house” kinda milking the situation in order to continue treating Brenchel like shit? It also shows me that Brit is playing the game by TECHNICALLY floating back and forth between sides while only now having a real SSA with Lane…so yes, Britney is a floater too.

      Hit me with your best shot Cames lol 😛

        • cammie nolan
        • August 13th, 2010

        lol ok here goes!
        First of all, I think it may be the “put upon, poor me” attitude that I can’t stand about Rachel! Brendon is just a piece of shit and a sorry excuse for a man in general and I can’t imagine how he would have played this game (which should be called ‘backstabbers’) without Rach.
        Another thing-I always thought the term floaters referred to people who don’t ‘play’ but try to coast under the radar till they get to jury. IF floaters means ppl who go back and forth from ‘side to side’ in the house then I stand corrected-BUT I still think the same way lmao.
        I totally discount Hayden putting Brenchel up-it was week one and no one knew anything about one another yet-Brenchel was stupid to put that target on their back themselves! It was the only thing Hayden could find as a reason to nominate someone.
        And that brings me to my central point-this game CANNOT be played “openly”. You HAVE to be a liar, a backstabber, two faced and a little sleazy to win. You have to be able to separate your ‘game’ from your ‘pesonality’ and Rachel, being a self appointed BB expert must KNOW this! So WHY keep whinning about why does everyone backstab and why do they hate us and why are they attacking us and blah blah blah ad nauseum?? STFU girl-you know why! Because you win HOH! AND we know you’re in an alliance-a damn STRONG alliance by the way-so you are a THREAT! Say what you want about the Brigade, but they HAVE kept their alliance a total secret from everyone (with the possible exception of Brit, the smartest person in this game).
        Yes this past week Brit and Ragan have taken talking behind someone’s back to new heights, but it has all been behind the back-on the surface, they have been pleasant and even fake friendly to Brenchel. That sucks in real life, but in BB that’s KEY. Brenchel on the other hand have put their feelings out there and gone after people to their face personally (floaters get your life vests-KRISTEN). I don’t blame anyone in the house for being catty-girl they need to blow off steam somehow! No entertainment, no activity and No sex except for Brenchel-another reason to hate them lol.
        The Brigade is sittin pretty for another week-Brendon won’t target them and they wanted someone else to get ragan, kathy and brit out of the house. Meow Meow and the Animal have a little side deal with Brendon to boot. Another great week ahead in BB12!!!

        • Cames I think that’s the issue, these dumbass hammies DO NOT know what the term “floater” actually means. From watching every season, the term “floater” basically means you have NO visible alliances and FLOAT back and forth between sides of the house, giving a vote as needed to cover your ass but never clearly picking a side and/or alliance. Perfect example, last season really didn’t have floaters….Ronnie tried but it was very clear what side he picked. BB10 had floaters – Jerry is the perfect example of a floater. He basically went to the side that was nominated and offered his vote for protection…and then went to the winning side and did the same. Flip Flopping, no REAL alliance, just covering their ass week to week. That is why floaters are dangerous, because the 2 sides will continue to knock each other out while the floater FLOATS on thru to the end. So altho Brechel never admitted or excepted the Wackade, it appears as if the entire house is aware of a the four male alliance. The house is aware of the Brenchel alliance. Until Andrew called them out, no one was aware of Kristen/Hayden; therefore, Kristen, Brit, Ragan, and Kathy are technically floaters….then Brenchel noticed Ragan and Matt were very close and correctly called out THAT alliance. Still leaves Brit & Kathy on their own….

          Have you watched BB6 or All Stars? THAT is how the game should really be played. You can talk about anyone behind their back but those hammies also had the balls to say that shit to the person’s face. You knew exactly where you stood, gameplay and personally as far as the votes and the house itself. These later seasons the house got caught up in personal attacks and even last night Brit & Ragan admitted they got so caught up their games have suffered as a result. All of a sudden, Hayden Brit and Ragan can admit they took shit too far for no reason, they just PERSONALLY didn’t liek Brenchel. Not once did they mention cuz they keep winning, just that they were targeting the showmance (note, not alliance, the showmance) Brendon is targeting Matt, which is why Matt is a have not and Matt is in the alliance…so even unintentionally the Wackade is targeted which is why Matt is really debating about using the DPOV if he gets put up, but wants to wait until after veto (apparently the DPOV can be played eviction night).

            • cammie nolan
            • August 13th, 2010

            I deidn’t watch all stars and I forget who was in season 6 so I don’t remember if I watched it lol. BUT I think there is more than one way to play BB and ED (BB..9? 10?) was extremely open to all about what he planned to do and yet went all the way to the end. Other times, like Dan, it’s played a little closer to the vest-and he won! So I guess it’s just different styles.
            I personally feel that Brendon went WAY over the edge, yelling at Brit-who is tiny-and bringing her boyfriend’s actions into it. He doesn’t even KNOW her bf so STFU and that to me is a total personal attack. And unfair. And douchey. So I’m hoping he’s gone ASAP. Don’t like him at all. Period. I’m feeling that production feels the same way since I’ve heard (but haven’t seen yet) that they showed his ex last night badmouthing him.
            Now having said all that–I readily admit that I could never play this game and you have actually applied to be on it, so you are probably a lot better at it than me. I sit at the feet of my master…yet I’ll still defend my view to the end! lol

          • NO problem Cames lol. There are many ways to play and I’m all for double and triple crossing folks, but I despise the way Ragan/Brit are going for the nasty route AND double & triple crossing AND being sanctimonious/condescending in the way they speak to others. Ragan/Brit keep complaining about Brenchel’s lack of integrity from day one when in all actuality, those 2 are the worse of the lot IMO. That’s all. I really do not have 2 many issues with the remainder of the house, just those 2 dumbasses. Brendon went over the edge purposely to put the target on his back remember? Brendon really didn’t go into personal attacks until they were nominated, and then hyperdrive after Brit told Rachel she wouldn’t use the veto even after Rach offered her the 5k.

    • mrtinigrl
    • August 12th, 2010

    I think Ragan “winning” saboteur has gone straight to his head. He probably thinks that he is America’s favorite and is thinking that we dont like Brenchel. Therefore, he is being very mean.
    He was a potential favorite…but now I cant wait to see him go.
    While Rachel hasnt been innocent of being obnoxious, over the top and annoying…she has tried to be friends with people. She has had a target on her back since day 1. How would others play if they had that target on their back???Her mistake was getting rid of Monet and Kristen–2 people she could beat.
    This house is going to be pissed when they find out about the Brigade. But my question is: when will the brigade turn on each other. There can only be a final 2.

    • cammie nolan
    • August 13th, 2010

    well if Brenchel thought Brit would use the veto if she got 5K then they REALLY need a lesson in BB! Accepting money PLUS using the veto to take down an HOH’s nom would have put an enormous target on Brit’s back! As far as I can tell, Monet is gone because she won 10K…
    I like Ragan. So call me a fruit fly. At least he knows when he’s being a shit and he feels actual guilt. I love that he was saying on BBAD last night that if he were a viewer he’d hate him too. Hope his chat with Brendon does him some good and it might even rehabilitate Bren in my eyes. However…I like Enzo too and he is realy without limits so far on the show! He’ll do anything to get ahead-except WIN something LMAO.

    • “However…I like Enzo too and he is realy without limits so far on the show! He’ll do anything to get ahead-except WIN something LMAO”
      lmaoooo THIS I totally agree with! BWAHAHAHAHA he is the most useless hammie, always looking around to make sure it’s not too soon for him to quit! But he does make me laugh…I can get behind him way before Ragan and Brit. And did you notice Ragan say he doesn’t regret anything he said or HOW he said it? So wtf does he regret if not what he said or the tone in which he said it? At 1st I kinda respect him, but after he said that I realized he was just blowing smoke up our asses.

        • cammie nolan
        • August 13th, 2010

        it’ll be interesting to see what happens this week. Looks like Brendon is making friends, despite what he told Rachel.
        Yeah yeah, I still like Ragan. I MUST be a fruit fly lol. I think being a HN and all the stress of last week is just getting to him. Hopefully he’ll rebound soon. I liked his gameplay early.
        How do you think they’re bringing Rachel back???

Comments are closed.
%d bloggers like this: